These are all the trainers that have been checked by one or more people. Every trainer gets a probability between 1% and 99%. 1% meaning that it is extremely unlikely that the trainer is a Fake NLP trainer and 99% meaning that it is extremely likely that the trainer is a Fake NLP trainer.
Would you please be so kind to fill in our checklist for your trainer so our subjective Bayesian statistical model can calculate the probability that this trainer is a Fake NLP trainer? That way we can see how trainers do and how many Fake NLP trainers there are. We thank you in advance. Also, if you disagree with the assessment below, fill in the checklist for a trainer already listed and we will add your answers to the mix and adjust the probability in the light of the information you have provided.
| Name | Country | Probability trainer is a Fake NLP trainer |
| Peter Dalmeijer | NL | 95% |
| Jaap Hollander | NL | 88% |
| Bouke de Boer | NL | 83% |
| Willy van Vuuren | NL | 67% |
| Robert Dilts | US | 21% |
| Steve G. Jones | US | 13% |
| John Grinder | US | 2% |
| Joost van der Leij | NL | 2% |
| Robin Stevens | NL | 1% |
| John LaValle | US | 1% |
| Richard Bandler | US | 1% |
| Kate Benson | UK | 1% |
| Fred van Schaagen | NL | 1% |
Nota bene: 98% of trainers score higher than a 50% probability of being a Fake NLP trainer. The fact that a trainer is not on this list, only increases this probability as trainers who are likely to be Fake NLP trainers probably also refuse to take the Fake NLP trainer test.